• slidebg1
  • slidebg1
  • slidebg1
  • Ragging in colleges: Educational institutions yet to implement SC guidelines
    Bengaluru, June 23: The incident in which a nursing student was forced to consume toilet cleaner in Read more...
  • locus to maintain appeal
    From the material placed on record, it is clear that the appellants have precise connection with the Read more...
  • Better to dance in bars than beg on streets
    Better to dance in bars than beg on streets: Supreme Court to Maharashtra "It is better to d Read more...
  • Constitution Of NCLT And NCLAT: A New Era Of Company Law Litigation In India
    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ('MCA') on 1st June 2016 notified the constitution of Nati Read more...
  • Justice delayed: India’s top courts take 10-15 years to decided on a case, says Law ministry study
    New Delhi: A study commissioned by the Union Law ministry has thrown up some interesting findings wi Read more...
  • Congratulation......
    Congratulation on Launch of Online Sotfwares Supreme Court and Supreme Court Criminal 1950 onwards t Read more...
  • Factual situation in the case
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.416 OF 2016 (Ar Read more...
  • High Court did not consider the specific case
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.524 OF 2016 (Ar Read more...
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL - APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1358 of 2008 - Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal39|Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Vigilance) vs. M/s Hindustan Lever Limited'|
    30-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    Dipak Misra, J.
                In the present appeal, by special leave, the appellant has called in question the legal
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal40|Maheshwar Peri & Others vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar General'|
    30-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KURIAN, J.
    Leave granted.
    2. What is the period of limitation for suo motu initiation of contempt proceedings, is the short question for considerat
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal41|Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Others vs. Union of India & Others'|
    30-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    Chelameswar, J.
    1. Leave granted in SLP (Civil) No.244 of 2016.
    2. The petitioners are employed with Prasar Bharati Corporation of India (hereinafter, “Prasar Bharati”)
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal42|Union of India & Ors. vs. Diler Singh'|
    30-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    Dipak Misra, J.
    The respondent, a constable in Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), was enrolled as such on 1.4.1990. He was posted in the 23 Battalion where he served co
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal43|Sanjivkumar Surajprakash Aggarwal vs. State Bank of India and Ors.'|
    30-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KURIAN, J.
    1. Leave granted.
    2. The dispute in this appeal is whether the tenancy created in favour of the appellant is a sham one or not. It is not in dispute tha
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal7|AARTHI vs. R.M. RAJESHKUMAR'|
    29-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KURIAN, J.

    1. Leave granted.

    2. The dispute essentially is as to whether HMOP No. 63 of 2013 on the file of Subordinate Judge,
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal8|M/s. Babu Ram Ashok Kumar vs. Mushtaq Ali and Ors'|
    29-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KURIAN, J.

    1. Leave granted.

    2. The appellant apparently is aggrieved since the application for restoration of the review of the Judgment dated 28.11
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal9|Committee of Management Anuragi Devi Degree College & Anr. vs. State of U.P. & Anr.'|
    29-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    DipakMisra, J.

    The first respondents vide its letter no. Aff.333/Seventy-6-2012-2 (356)/2012 dated 12.09.2012, granted prior permission for provisional affiliation
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal10|Delhi Development Authority vs. Kenneth Builders & Developers Ltd. & Ors.'|
    29-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    Madan B. Lokur, J.

    1. Delay condoned. Leave granted in both petitions.
    2. The appellant (Delhi Development Authority or the DDA) in the first appeal is aggri
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|2016(6)BLegal11|Divisional Manager and Ors. vs. Vinayak Chintaman Gawande and Ors.'|
    29-06-2016|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KURIAN, J.
    1. Leave granted.

    2. The appellants are aggrieved by the award passed by the Labour Court, Chandrapur, Maharashtra dated 23.09.2005, whereby the
    Read more...